THIS SCHOOLBOOK OF 1966 LISTS POLITICAL FACTS DIVORCED FROM TANGIBLE INTERESTS
An unexplained uprising
"Did Polignac have to retire? The Charter did not oblige the king to choose his ministers among the Chamber's majority. Rather than cede, Charles X preferred dissolution, but the electors [what interests do they represent?] returned a hostile majority. Then the king, by the Four Ordinances [useless erudition] pronounced the dissolution of the new Chamber, modified the electoral regime and the regime of the press by his own authority. [What did that mean in practice?] It was a veritable coup d'état: the Charter did not allow the king to make up the law (July 25, 1830).
Pushed by secret societies where young republicans were numerous, by journalists, by patrons exciting their workers, the people of Paris revolted against the ordinances. The rebels flew the tricolor [meaning?]. After three days of street fighting [error: the first day Parisians were simply surprised] (the "Three Glorious Days," July 27,28, 29 1830) in which the royal guard was engaged — the rest of the army abstained from fighting [why?] — the capital was lost for Charles X."
Recent schoolbooks divide facts into themes and highlight individuals. Accounts are more palatable but not more comprehensible.
Now try this.
* * *
Next,
No comments:
Post a Comment